I LURED YOU HERE SORRY BUT I CANT STAND THEM I AM GOING CRAZY FROM ALL THESE PONY ****S AND I THINK THEY ARE BAD BAD AS BAD AS BAD CAN BE AND I HATE THEM ANYONE PLEASE HELP MOI GETTING RID OF PONY THREADS ADBLOCK SOON I BLOCK THYMOLE ON HG FORUMS I HATE THEIR POSTS SO MUCH DAMN IM GOING CRAZY ID BLOCK HALF OF AOMH IF IT WAS POSSIBLE MODZ ADS A BLOCK FUTURE PLEASE AND YES I KNOW IM A SCREMING GUY BUT EEN THOG I SPELT IT ALL WRONNG I DONT CARE COS PONIES ARE BAD EVEN IF YOU DELETE TH9IS THEREAD WI EWILL STIÖLL HATE POPNIIES IMM TYYPING SO FAST MY KEYBOARD ECXPLPORDES OUT OF NAGAER DAKMNM YOU PONY LOVING FREAASAADDFAS AND DONT DELETE THREAD OR EDIT IT OR ME WILL BE A MAD MAD PERSON YES I KNEW YOU ARE EDIT IT ALL OR HIDE JYUUSTYDN ,NSCOZ U ARE PONI FREAKS WTH NO FACES I HATE YOU ALL YOU BASTARDS AND BY THAT IM REFFERING TO THE PONIES LOLLOLOLOL I AM GOING TO CLICK SUBLKJIOT BTTTN NOW COZ OF EXTREME RAGE PLEASE THANKS LOL WTF WWW W THE QFT BBQ
WRP, stop pretending you're a pro at HTML, it's silly. href is not a description, it's clearly an attribute. And by defenition, an <a> tag should always contain an href="" attribute, even if it's actually not linking anywhere.
For example, some would argue it's the most semantic element for a button going to the next image in a slideshow for example, and I would agree:
I haven't studied terminology. AND, I'm an autodidact. Autodidacts don't really care for terminology, just for how things work.
But that thing you wrote makes no sense. Basically it says that the page is in english and it's called TITLE and it's a blank page with "Next" written there that links to the next thing.
-- Edited by WRP_Beater on Saturday 10th of September 2011 10:45:42 PM
WRP, your html is completely lacking in semantics and standards, you really ought to read up on why we have these standards in the first place.
"But that thing you wrote makes no sense. Basically it says that the page is in english and it's called TITLE and it's a blank page with "Next" written there that links to the next thing."
Yes, that's what an example is. I showed you how you should use the a href="#" instead of just an <a>.
Also, you used the extremely outdated name attribute, which was deprecated in HTML5, meaning your code is not future compliant, nor does it use any form of progressive enchancement. Future proof code is important, why would we otherwise use BOTH the vendor prefixes and the current standard when we write css3 code?
Progress is not always good. I don't see why they deprecated <a name>, it's functional and comfortable. Also, Windows XP > Windows 7, that's proof of progress not being always good.
And Olympus, I remembered you as a nice guy, where's the old WRP's friend GoO?
Alright, you've got a point, I'll not hate on ya. I'll just point out though, that what the developers of html5 do is probably for the best, even if it might not be as comfortable. Just think of all the new, useful elements they've created to help semantics. Sorry about the rant :p.